OUR FANHOUSE TOOLBAR INTEGRATES THE LATEST SPORTS NEWS INTO YOUR WEB BROWSER AND INSTALLS IN SECONDS.
YOU CAN DOWNLOAD THE TOOLBAR HERE.

Boxing

Manny Pacquiao vs. Ricky Hatton Is Too Big to Fail

As long as Floyd Mayweather is retired and Wladimir Klitschko and Vitali Klitschko obey their mother's command not to fight each other, there is exactly one boxing match that could possibly garner major mainstream media attention in 2009: Manny Pacquiao vs. Ricky Hatton.

Pacquiao vs. Hatton would be a wonderful fight matching two of the best boxers in the world, both of whom can draw in the United States and are huge stars in their own countries. Simply put, Pacquiao vs. Hatton is, like Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, too big to fail.

And yet all indications are that negotiations for getting this fight done have failed because Pacquiao wants at least 60% of the revenue and Hatton won't take less than half. Just look at the headlines:

Pacquiao-Hatton on Brink of Collapse (Los Angeles Times)

Superfight Off as Filipino Walks Out (Telegraph)

Pacman-Hatton Bout Off (Manila Times)

Manny Wants $13 Million, Arum Fears Fight Canceled (Philippines Star)

Although the difference between a 60-40 split and a 50-50 split represents several million dollars, I still believe this fight is going to happen because it's too big to fail: It's big enough that even if one boxer or the other agrees to less than favorable terms, he'll be getting more money than he'd get against any other opponent. This fight has to happen.

More thoughts at FightOpinion.com.

Related Articles

Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)